On 04/04/2019 00:14, marc marc wrote:
Le 04.04.19 à 00:00, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
There are such restrictions in some places and we should map them,
if we know it well, or not add or modify them if we’re unsure or unacquainted.
but we don't map the legislation, isn't it ?
or next step is adding access=private on all houses and
access=permissive on all shop ?
a default value per religion/country look like a better idea
What is the default value of the `access` tag?
The default value of the `oneway` tag on `highway` is `oneway=no`. But I
don't think `access` has a default value *for all OSM objects*. For
`highway=primary`, the default is `access=yes`. For `shop=supermarket`,
the default is `access=permissive`. We don't add `access=yes` to roads,
so we shouldn't add `access=permissive` to supermarkets.
So what's the default `access` for `amenity=place_of_worship`?
I don't think there can be a default *for all types of PoW*.
* `access=permissive` is the default for Catholic church facilities in
Ireland, but `access=private` for Catholic friaries & monasteries.
* `access=adherent(s)` for some Muslim facilities in Morocco (right?)
* `access=permissive` for Mormon genealogy facilities, but
`access=adherent(s)` to the Mormon temple facility (right?)
I think data consumers need to use their heads. If you're making a
cycling routing engine, use a default `bicycle=no` for
`highway=motorway`. If you're making a site to show tourist-y places in
a city, don't include `amenity=place_of_worship` with
`access=adherent(s)/no/private`, and if there's no `access` tag, then
look at the other tags/location and make an educated guess. If you're
making a "Find my local Catholic Church" app, then include
`access=adherents` or a missing `access` tag on a catholic church.
Rory
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
