Mar 29, 2019, 8:26 AM by 61sundow...@gmail.com: > On 29/03/19 17:59, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >> >> >> sent from a phone >> >> On 29. Mar 2019, at 07:05, Warin <>> 61sundow...@gmail.com >> <mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>>> > wrote: >> >> >>> This one has been sitting for a long while! Still not certain >>> about some aspects of it. >>> >>> >>> See what you make of it. >>> >>> >>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Area-steps >>> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Area-steps> >>> >>> >>> >>> Discussion here for preference. >>> >> >> >> can you explain how it relates to this proposal? >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Area >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Area> >> >> > > That proposal is very broad , it defines implicit areas of any kind, > steps, ramps, flat bits . I think that is too much in one proposal to > consider and detail. > > > This proposal only does steps. Just steps. It details how larger step > areas, > say 5 m width, can be mapped. > > Consider in this proposal; > should the upper and lower ways be tagged with highway=footway so as to > connect the two laterals? > should the laterals be tagged with highway=steps > That may aid editing, rendering and routing... > It may be useful to mention relation to "area:highway=steps" tagging - is it a competing incompatible, double tagging of the same feature or something else.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
