On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:24 PM Phake Nick <c933...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Come to think of it, if the goal is to represent different perspective of > disputed territory, then mapping disputed territories as disputed territory > using claimed_by=* controlled_by=* does not seems like a good idea, as such > an area in OSM would need to include a line separating the disputed > territory from the territory it control which a number of countries would > refuse to recognize. I think it's better to simply map the outer boundary > of those countries' theoretical border and apply relevant tags describing > the identify of the area instead. > Agree, a separate relation that outlines a country's border from that country's perspective would be much easier to use (with an appropriate tag - e.g. POV=countrycode). Note that this also applies to sub-country admin levels too, e.g. Crimea might have a different administrative division according to UK and RU, which in some cases would be the same as on-the-ground-truth.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
