Am Mi., 13. März 2019 um 14:31 Uhr schrieb Sergio Manzi <s...@smz.it>:
> If a "*superroute*" has an official status (*like this one: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20773 > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20773>*), I'm all-in for that. > > If instead it is something "*invented*" by the mapper, than I'm > all-against it. > > Can you please provide more information/examples/context? > there are really long relations (e.g. Via Francigena / St. Francis Way, or European E-Routes, which cross half of Europe). Splitting them into smaller pieces helps reducing editing conflicts (2 people editing the same object at the same time). This is often done along administrative boundaries (regional, national). Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
