Sorry, I am getting confused here (I am listening in as I frequently map bìcycle routes). The "oneway" tag would only make sense on a loop-shaped route. And only if there are only ways and no nodes like signposts ecc, and if there are no branches, and only if all members of the route were oneway ways. Very special case. I normally handle oneway ways in a route which is bidirectional using the forward/backward roles on the ways concerned (as is also normal practice on bus routes around my part of the world). This is frequent for bicycles, but I would expect it to be very rare for pedestrians. If you want to indicate the preferred direction of a walking route that is basically loop-shaped, a concept that is different from the legally binding oneway, then some kind of clockwise / anticlockwise tagging should be used. If a hiking route contains parts which are oneway for pedestians then this should be tagged an all ways to which this applies with "oneway:foot=yes".
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 at 23:19, Jmapb <jm...@gmx.com> wrote: > On 3/12/2019 6:09 PM, Warin wrote: > > > On 13/03/19 08:59, Jmapb wrote: > >> > >> Is there any point in considering a tag for oneways that are not > >> enforced but generally done nonetheless? oneway=traditional, > >> oneway=suggested, something like that? (Again, I know I've seen > >> these, but I can't think of an example offhand.) > >> > > > > oneway=recommended? matches present use of 4wd=recommended > > I like it. Now I just have to remember where to put it. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
