Before deprecating the shop=fashion tag, shouldn't we reach out to the mappers that use shop=fashion ?
Maybe they have a lot more domain knowledge than the people on this mailing list and can explain why they used shop=fashion and not shop=clothes; clothes=... (you know diversity and white privileged men and things) m. On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:11 AM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Am Mo., 11. März 2019 um 23:29 Uhr schrieb Graeme Fitzpatrick > <graemefi...@gmail.com>: >> >> >>> >>> Looking again, there is a category for this with "women;men;children" 242 >>> times used, "women;men" even has 489. "fashion" is also present with 184 >>> uses (0,9%). >> >> >>> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/clothes#values >> >> >> & there's also myriads of men;women;children, women;children;men, >> women;babies;children & every other possible combination you could ever >> imagine (or create by a typo!) > > > > yes, these exist as possibilities, but in the real world people use > "women;men" and "women;men;children". The other combinations are in low > numbers. > > > >> >> Yeah, 230k shop=clothes but only 20k of all "types" of clothes combined, >> then 7000 =fashion & 15000 =boutique, but from the comments here, you have >> to wonder how many of those "boutiques" are actually selling high-level >> (very expensive!) clothing? > > > > Not sure what you expect from "boutique". There are shops where a sweat shirt > is 1000 Euros and others where it is 100. Both may be "boutiques" but the > price differences are significant to most of us ;-) > > Cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
