On 12/03/19 02:32, Peter Elderson wrote:
you can use landcover, it has about 160K uses now by 6000 users, but you should know that
a. landcover is not currently rendered by OSM Carto.
b. THe proposal states that "All areas in the landcover features ofnatural <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:natural>=*will be transfered tolandcover <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landcover>=*. ...The tagslanduse <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse>=grass <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass>,landuse <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse>=forest <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dforest>andlanduse <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse>=railway <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Drailway>will be transfered tolandcover <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landcover>=*." This is certainly not going to happen any time soon.

And it is incorrect. landuse=railway is a use of the land, it does not indicate a land cover.


If you decide to use landcover for existing area's, use it in addition to current mapping. For instance, if you replace landuse=grass with landcover=grass, or natural=wood with landcover=trees, most renderings suddenly will show these areas as grey. I would not recommend that, in fact you'll get a storm of protest! So in these cases, you use landcover in addition to landuse, and when landcover gets rendered (which I'm sure it will, some time) you can alter landuse without greying the map.
Not all present landuse tags are landcovers.

To add patches of trees and grass in an area with landuse=residential, industrial or leisure, you can use landcover, though it will not yet show op on OSM Carto.

Some of the tags relevant when mapping land covers are the keys natural=*, landcover=*, building=*, sub keys surface=* and the one value landcover=grass. The landuse=residential, industrial or leisure are not relevant to land cover as they may have different land covers within their boundaries.

Also, major editors allow entering landcover, but have no special support for landcover tags.

Of course, if you make your own map style for the project, you can make landcover show up, just remember that the standard OSM Carto map does not.


Fr gr Peter Elderson


Op ma 11 mrt. 2019 om 15:16 schreef Lorenzo Stucchi <lorenzostucch...@outlook.it <mailto:lorenzostucch...@outlook.it>>:

    Hi all,

    I’m Lorenzo, the vice-president of PoliMappers, the YouthMappers
    chapter in Politecnico di Milano, we are going to organize a
    mapathon in Milan talking about deforestation, in collaboration
    with the Semillero Geolab UdeA, a Colombian chapter of YouthMappers.

    We will would like to map land-cover in an area near the Amazonian
    forest, the mappers will be people that have few experience in
    mapping so we are thinking to map basic elements in landuse and we
    found this proposal [1] on map basic elements.

    The idea was to map: bareland, artificial surface and forest.

    Should be a good idea to map following this idea?

    Thanks for all the possible answer.

    Best regards,
    Lorenzo Stucchi


    [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Rudolf/draft_landcover

    _______________________________________________
    Tagging mailing list
    Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
    https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging



_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to