I think it is not correct. Parking zones in a street are not amenity=parking , are they? It would be very interesting solution...but parking zone in a street is not a parking (an specific place for park). Parking spaces would fit correctly, but as you can see not all the parkings zones have drawn all the parking spaces. I wish to use standard parking:lane properties...but not with amenity=parking tag...or is it a correct use?
Salut i mapes yopaseopor On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 7:15 PM Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 17:49, yo paseopor <yopaseo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I mean something like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675000355 >> or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675000354 >> or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/67500085 >> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675000856> >> > > Which look, in the editor, exactly like the examples I gave links to. So > what's wrong with the > solution I used? I can't remember where I got the idea from, but I > probably found it somewhere > in the wiki or suggested in one of the forums. It handles the situation > well. It's a parking area > which has one side contiguous with the road. Big advantages: it renders > and it shows a P > symbol. What more do you want? > > -- > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
