> I didn't follow the discussion but this proposal is at least > helpful. > Why not map xx:xx in the same route relation? Role > examples: > stop@00:20, stop_exit_only@03:45, > stop_entry_only@00:25-00:31, and for > bus stops where the timetable is approximated (like in > Brazil) use "~" > for the usual times, examples: stop@~00:27-00:30, > stop_exit_only@~00:46
That was actually what I had originally proposed. My role format was stop:+00:32, though, which is only slightly different. People in this list noted that it would corrupt existing relation roles, so I redesigned the proposal to have no effect on existing data. I have since been trying to come up with other ways to encode this data, including separate relations, tags on the bus stops, and additional tags in the bus route relation. I have left those out of the current proposal, though, to keep it simple. Perhaps this is something that could be proposed later. Here is a link to the current proposal, which everyone with a wiki account can now vote on: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_transport_schedules/Departures Thanks for your enthusiasm, Leif Rasmussen
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
