I don't take dismissive and generalizing statements on a project I have been putting 3+ years of lifeblood into, invest much of my free time in and offer as open source for the betterment of OSM, lightly.
If you have a concrete constructive suggestion to make, do it, otherwise, save your breath. Tobias On 14/02/2019 11:45, Wiklund Johan wrote: > I think that apps adding redundant tags to cover for a tiny number of special > cases is going to cause more problems than it solves (i.e. users > misinterpreting the question and adding "private" access to all kinds of > roads). StreetBloat instead of StreetComplete :) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com] > Sent: torsdag 14. februar 2019 10.36 > To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] StreetComplete 10 / foot=yes on residential > > > > sent from a phone > >> On 14. Feb 2019, at 10:26, Florian Lohoff <f...@zz.de> wrote: >> >> All residentials are accessible to pedestrians so i a bit puzzled what >> this challenge is good for. It just adds redundant tags to all roads. > > > I agree the default is accessibility for everyone on non-motorroad roads. > There might be residential roads with private access (in the occasions I met > where access was private I was tending towards service, although with general > public access I would have called them residentials). > > Cheers, Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
