On 24/01/19 12:16, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:

On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 10:19, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com <mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com>> wrote:


    > On 23. Jan 2019, at 22:35, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com
    <mailto:pla16...@gmail.com>> wrote:
    >
    > According to the wiki, they're not
    > based on services either.


    if the wiki says it explicitly like this we should fix it.


Just looking & it's a mixture, & also a bit of a mess

=city: the largest settlement or settlements within a territory

=town: an important urban centre ... normally have a good range of shops and facilities which are used by people from nearby villages.

=village: A settlement with between 1,000 and 10,000 inhabitants

=hamlet: an isolated settlement, typically with less than 100-200 inhabitants

=isolated_dwelling: the smallest kind of human settlement. They are outside other settlements ... must not consist of more than 2 households

=locality: an unpopulated location (but the example photo is of an inhabited village!)

I would suggest we remove all reference to number of inhabitants, & base the decision on each mappers own recognition of how "important" this place is, so an isolated "village" with only a few hundred people in it, but which is the main centre for this area will be a town, & maybe even a city?

No, the population size is a handy guide and should be kept - as a guide. May add the word 'typically' where it is missing?


I'm happy to have a go at them if we're willing?

A problem is that the British have a system .. based on old definitions - using things like cathedrals to help define their definitions.

On 'one set of rules' is going to match world wide. The number of pubs may be a useful criteria in Australia, but not in Morocco.

The document needs to be a guide .. not a 'rule'.
One guide should be that surrounding places must be relative in level of important to the place that is being mapped. I don't think a place with no post office can be more important than a place with a post office in the same area.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to