On 23/01/19 07:31, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:



Jan 21, 2019, 9:44 PM by pla16...@gmail.com:

    On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 at 20:21, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com
    <mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>> wrote:


        My problem with going to landuse=forestry with natural=wood...

        what happens to the remaining landuse=forest?
        Will that finally be recognised as the same as natural=wood
        and be migrated to natural=wood???


    Ideally, if we get landuse=forestry and it eventually renders

Note that it is not obvious to me that a typical map would want to display landuse=forestry.


In Australia forestry areas are rendered differently. They are seen as a land use that is worth showing, like residential areas are worth showing.

The UK Landranger 1:50,000 show forestry commission land ...

I think you'll find a great many maps identify forestry.

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to