On 20.01.19 18:06, Roland Olbricht wrote: > I am also a bit surprised: a common interpretation of the text of > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging > (which is where https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level > refers to) is that the level tag keeps the level numbering scheme of the > operator whenever it is sufficently tied to numbers (that's almost > always the case).
That's true, and having entrances at different "street levels" is therefore not a problem: You can just follow the operator's choice. Being "sufficiently tied to numbers" is an issue, though. SIT assumes integer level numbers, where the level above level=n is level=n+1 So from a SIT perspective, the problem isn't that the US (and other places) call the ground level "1". It's that the level below that is called "-1" rather than "0". You could still make it compatible with Simple Indoor Tagging by adding a skipped_levels=0 tag to the building, but this tag has only been used five times so far. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
