Someone asked what the requirements for a TOP in Nederland were. Not the OSM definition, but the actual requirements for the operators. I've answered that, without implying that these were OSM requirements or definitions. I have made that explicitly clear in several messages. Please do not suggest otherwise.
For OSM tagging, I am consistently working towards a basic tagging for all designated/customary trailheads, including all TOPs en Natuurpoorten, for existing and future mappers who find these worth mapping. Op do 10 jan. 2019 om 10:19 schreef Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com>: > So we are back to what I wrote a couple of days ago, after I saw that > Peter was struggling to come up with a trailhead definition that fits > all the "TOP"s. > > We have on one hand trailheads (for which we seem to have a consensus) > and on the other hand TOPs, which sometimes fit the definition of > trailheads and sometimes not. > > m. > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 9:22 PM Andy Townsend <ajt1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 09/01/2019 18:35, Kevin Kenny wrote: > > > Are we back to trying to warp the definition so that only > > > Toeristich Overstappunt qualifies? > > > > > The reverse of that, actually - based on my limited knowledge of these > > in Noord Holland (which to be fair Peter said weren't typical of the > > Dutch ones) they didn't look much like trailheads to me. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Vr gr Peter Elderson
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
