Am Mi., 9. Jan. 2019 um 10:36 Uhr schrieb Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org >:
> I fear that people will otherwise with great diligence and fun tag > things like the "Iberian Peninsula" which will not be of any use and > just lead to more relation clutter. (Cf. discussion about bays.) while I would not advocate either for modelling the Iberian Peninsula with our current system (e.g. as multipolygon), I would like to express dissent on the motion it "would not be of any use". IMHO it clearly would be desirable to be able to map big "objects" like this in a smart way. WM has WP records for 120 languages for the Iberian Peninsula [1], there will be people interested in this, no? The only reasons I see for approving "small" peninsulas" but not big ones, are of technical nature (limitations of what we can model, and how expensive it is). On a sidenote: the Iberian Peninsula is already mapped in OSM as a relation, and it is in Version 848 ;-) https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3870917 Cheers, Martin [1] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q12837
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
