Tagging as glamping is very helpful because glamping is a recognized concept, 
so you can learn more about it at many places on the web, one of which can be 
Wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glamping.

But I wouldn’t tag luxury or glamour to reflect that a glamping is a luxury or 
glamour place because that is already part of the concept.

And if a particular glamping was to have more luxury or glamour than the 
average, tagging as luxury or glamour is tempting as it would reflect this one 
has *extra* offerings over the average.

But then of course, the question of anyone curious at this place will be to 
wonder what more luxury or glamour this one has over an average one.

And this would be because of infrastructure or services which is then to be 
tagged as it is verifiable and much more informative than a simple luxury=yes 
tag.

And you leave to the user to decide if it is luxury or not, because what is 
“luxury” for one can be just “normal” for someone else or can change over time 
(because what was luxury years ago is maybe not anymore today).
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to