Am Mi., 5. Dez. 2018 um 14:48 Uhr schrieb Philip Barnes < p...@trigpoint.me.uk>:
> Just tried in iD, landuse is pre-programmed, not leisure. > that doesn't mean much, as iD developers, at least in the past, ignored the comunity decisions in more than one instance. It could be an indice to look if this has distorted the stats though (i.e. see when it was introduced as a preset for iD). Looking at usage numbers, it seems correct to discourage leisure for this tag, as it was introduced in 2009 by an import, started to grow organically from 2011 to 2015 and is stalling since then, while landuse was introduced pre 2008 and does not show any "import steps", and it is at more than double the usage currently. Still, from a systematic point of view, I would consider leisure the better tag, if this is not meant as a property but as a feature, similar to other comparable leisure features like pitches, stadia, swimming pools, sports centres, most of which have usage numbers orders of magnitude higher than recreation grounds, and which all use the leisure key. Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
