sent from a phone
> On 30. Nov 2018, at 00:27, Doug Hembry <doughem...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >> +1 (mostly). The boundary=protected_area scheme allows rough/detail > >> tagging to some degree, I think. I presume you can specify b=p_area > >> without adding p_class if you wish yes, you can do it, but then the tag says too little, because it could be anything from a protected habitat of a rare kind of frog to an historic house (heritage) to a national monument, to a national forest, to a water or air protection area, etc. What I meant was that the basic level of tagging should already specify something “meaningful”. Ciao, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
