Don't you see it *possible* that sms payment can be made through different clearinghouses/operators? Really?
Cheers! On 2018-11-29 14:13, Michael Brandtner wrote: > If I pay per SMS, then I don't pay per app. It doesn't make sense to have > both in the same key. I do like bkil's suggestions but do think that the tags > should be as specific as possible, even if that means to have multiple keys > with the same value. > > So for example: > payment:sms=yes > payment:AppName1=yes > payment:AppName2y=yes > ref:sms=12345 > contact:sms=0127 > ref:AppName1=12345 > ref:AppName2=12345 > > This leads me to another interesting question: Should these be added to > amenity=parking or to vending=parking_tickets? > In my opinion it makes more sense to add them to the parking lot itself > because I don't need the ticket machine if I use pay by phone. But the wiki > only suggests payment=* keys for vending=parking_tickets, not for > amenity=parking. > > > Sergio Manzi <s...@smz.it> schrieb am 21:15 Mittwoch, 28.November 2018: > > > Sorry, but it should be: > > payment:sms=yes > payment:sms:WhateverPayApp=yes > payment:sms:WhateverPayApp:contact=<phone number to send> > payment:sms:WhateverPayApp:ref:payment=<code to send> > > because, sooner or later, multiple payment options/clearingouse/apps could be > supported and each should have its info. > The "ref:" could be go, IMHO... > Cheers, > Sergio Manzi > > On 2018-11-28 21:07, bkil wrote: >> payment:sms=yes >> payment:WhateverPayApp=yes >> contact:sms=<phone number to send> >> ref:payment=<code to send> >> >> As an alternative, ref:sms=* would also work for me, though I think >> it's redundant if the code is the same for all payment options. >> ref:payment:sms=* sounds a bit excessive, but would be the most >> correct tagging. However, OSM strives for consistency and >> mapper-friendliness more than "correct" tagging in most cases, so I. >> >> I would definitely mark the exact payment variety, like >> >> * payment:sms=*, >> * payment:app=* or even better payment:WhateverPayApp=*, >> * payment:mastercard_contactless=*. >> >> I don't recommend using payment:pay_by_phone=* or >> payment:contactless=* due to the sheer number of incompatible >> different payment solutions (see wiki). It sounds worse to me than >> payment:debit_cards=* that many disapprove of, while I do use >> payment:debit_cards=* myself. I actually wanted to bring this up in a >> new topic recently: >> >>>> payment:contactless=* >> Contactless payment on Wikipedia and Contactless smart card on Wikipedia >> Used to indicate that a venue has 'contactless' (RFID/NFC-based) bank >> card readers. You may consider adding the precise variety of >> contactless smart card accepted: payment:expresspay=*, >> payment:mastercard_contactless=* (formerly payment:paypass=*), >> payment:visa_contactless=* (alternatively payment:paywave=*), >> payment:quickpass=*, payment:quicpay=* (overseas J/Speedy, commonly >> payment:QUICPay=*), payment:rupay_contactless=*, payment:zip=*, >> payment:mifare=* >> (wikipedia:en:MIFARE#Places_that_use_MIFARE_products), >> payment:felica=*(wikipedia:en:FeliCa#Card_usage), payment:wechat=* >> (wikipedia:en:WeChat#WeChat_Pay_payment_services), payment:alipay=* >> (wikipedia:en:Alipay#Comparison_with_other_payment_systems), >> payment:venmo=*. Not to be confused with contactless electronic >> variants of payment:meal_vouchers=* and payment:electronic_purses=* >> that are used in-house at many places. << >> >> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 9:29 AM Philip Barnes <p...@trigpoint.me.uk> >> <mailto:p...@trigpoint.me.uk> wrote: >>> On 21 November 2018 12:45:30 GMT, Michael Brandtner >>> <brandtner_mich...@yahoo.de> <mailto:brandtner_mich...@yahoo.de> wrote: >>>> Philip Barnes <p...@trigpoint.me.uk> <mailto:p...@trigpoint.me.uk> schrieb >>>> am 23:29 Dienstag, >>>> 20.November 2018: >>>> >>>>> I am not 100% sure that mobile payment is the correct term, that to >>>> me implies using your phone for contactless payment. >>>> But wouldn't that be payment:contactless? >>>> >>>>> The English term used in these cases is Pay by Phone. >>>> So your suggestion is payment:pay_by_phone and ref:pay_by_phone? >>> That is correct, pay by phone is the normal English usage. >>> >>> Phil (trigpoint) >>> -- >>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
