On 27/11/2018 23:01, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
This proposal has several problems:
1) Too many new relations, up to 180 per border or whatever the number of independent states has reached.

It's a concern (I've made similar points about languages in the past) but in this case I don't think that there will be _that_ many new border relations. To take Ukraine as an example, there will only I suspect be one extra relation, with a very large number of "according_to:XX" tags as almost everyone supports Ukraine's border claim, but it doesn't match the current line of control. You might get up to a dozen in some areas (perhaps around the South China Sea, also UK with or without Chagos Archipelago, Falklands, Gibraltar etc.), but I suspect not many more than that.


2) OSM is for “real, current” data
- Claimed borders are not real.
- Many old claims have never been officially surrendered

It's true that verifiability is an issue here (the problems with some historic claims were mentioned in a previous thread) but in many cases there really isn't an argument about _where_ the border is, only _what_ the status of the thing within it has, and (taking Ukraine as an example again) I'd suggest that the statement "Ukraine claims that Crimea is part of Ukraine" is very verifiable.


3) “Don’t map your local legislation”
- legislation in country X has no jurisdiction in country Y
Where the wiki says "Don't map your local legislation" it's again just making a point about verifiability. "legislation in country X has no jurisdiction in country Y" doesn't seem to exist in the OSM wiki at all; so I guess that you're just saying that _only_ de facto boundaries should be in OSM? That's nearly where we are now, except that we do have a border for e.g. Western Sahara, and attempts have been made to map the claims between India, China and Pakistan (but not currently the resulting claimed country borders).

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 6:43 AM Rory McCann <r...@technomancy.org <mailto:r...@technomancy.org>> wrote:

    This is my suggestion for how to map disputed/claimed borders.
    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ClaimedBorders
    (but I appear to have broken the wiki).
    (text snipped)
    == Examples ==


Just a thought - how about uploading some examples as a test to the dev server (or elsewhere) to allow people to experiment with the data? It's often easier to see potential problems once you're actually trying to process the data rather than in the abstract.

Best Regards,

Andy
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to