Please, just forget about trees (/and the fact that they obviously grow.../): trees have only been the "/casus belli/", the case for which we asked ourselves how "Estimated values for height" (/the topic of this thread.../) should be tagged.
The real question, I think, is if it is correct to have all those est_* keys or there could be a better way to indicate the accuracy of a measure. Cheers, Sergio On 2018-11-12 11:01, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > I believe there is way too much fuzz about this, almost every number in OSM > is estimated, the height of a tree cannot be measured to the mm even with the > most precise instruments (and even if you could, it would be outdated within > the same day). Just add the height. > > Cheers, > Martin
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
