I would envision it including the state-level representations plus the various non-diplomatic "liaison offices" and "institutes" (e.g., American Institute in Taiwan) that are pseudo-embassies and in many cases lack both diplomatic status and immunities. So diplomatic_representation would probably be a bridge too far.
On 11/1/2018 10:16 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > sent from a phone > >> On 1. Nov 2018, at 17:57, Allan Mustard <al...@mustard.net> wrote: >> >> How about amenity=embassy, amenity=consulate, plus amenity=representation to >> capture those facilities that are neither pudding nor frozen, er, sorry, >> neither embassies nor consulates? Any heartburn there? Then we use >> diplomatic=* as an additional tag (i.e., continue current practice) to >> specify different flavors, er, types of diplomatic/consular mission? Should >> I modify the proposed feature to that? > > +1, maybe “representation” could become “diplomatic_representation” or would > that be incorrect for some of them? I see it is unwieldy, but > “representation” alone can mean a link of things, so I would suggest to be > more verbose. > > > Cheers, > Martin >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
