I agree. Keep it to three: [embassy, consulate, other]. If the mapper doesn't know, he can check the Ministry of Foreign Affairs website. The information will typically be there.
apm-wa On 10/27/2018 9:20 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > On 27.10.2018 11:57, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: >> Tagging something as office=diplomatic then diplomatic=non-diplomatic >> sounds silly and oxymoronic. Why not simply diplomatic=other? Also we >> should allow diplomatic=yes if the mapper doesn't know the exact type. >> Therefore diplomatic=[embassy, consulate, other, yes]. > Would "yes" not be implied already by office=diplomatic? If someone > wasn't sure they could just use office=diplomatic without diplomatic=*. > > (Side note, I've seen diplomatic offices that were so cordoned off by > local security forces that you wouldn't even come close enough to > determine whether this is a government facility or a diplomatic one. Of > course you can always ask the guards but maybe that only makes you > suspicious ;) > > Bye > Frederik >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
