22. Oct 2018 17:28 by frede...@remote.org <mailto:frede...@remote.org>:
> On 10/22/18 11:03, François Lacombe wrote: >> Even if sub_station is often 1:1 of substation, this have to be replaced >> carefully since objects can have been mis tagged as power=sub_station. >> In France, last objects where removed this summer. There was about 150 >> of them and it was not so hard to review each one. > > I think a manual review is certainly better than an automated > conversion. If an object uses a tagging scheme that has long since been > replaced with a new one, maybe the object itself has also ceased to > exist, or demands some kind of change. > > Manual review may be slower but yields a higher-quality result. > I agree that manual review of anything improbes map, but I am not sure why mistagged power=sub_station is better or worse than mistagged power=substation
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
