Le dim. 21 oct. 2018 à 19:13, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> a écrit :
> The same may be said about exactly any classification. Major power lines > and minor ones > > categorization is not unique to OSM tagging, the same split is present in > other maps. > Always doing so doesn't make data objective nor an acceptable practice. Le dim. 21 oct. 2018 à 19:25, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> a écrit : > height=* then ? > > Impossible to do in aerial-based mapping, unreasonable even for ground > survey mapping. > There is also open data. For instance, osmose currently propose to complete all transmission towers in France with this file https://opendata.reseaux-energies.fr/explore/dataset/pylones-rte/information/?disjunctive.etat&disjunctive.tension&sort=-hauteur_pylone Heights are going from 8m to >100m Nevertheless, height is attached to support, not the line itself. Le dim. 21 oct. 2018 à 19:43, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> a écrit : > 20. Oct 2018 09:03 by fl.infosrese...@gmail.com: > You may disagree with it or considered it as unimportant but there is at > least one other > > pro argument - ease of mapping for people not interested in mapping > details like > > exact height or voltage. > People aren't forced to produce completed object at first time they map them. People may be annoyed with such a question "is the line is minor or just a line?" if they're not interested. That's why we are looking for a default meaning for unqualified power lines as to encourage knowledgeable people to improve their tagging. Mappers doesn't always use bare JOSM to map, other useful tools help them to produce data at a high quality level. Agree with Marc marc, the best situation is power=line which can be completed with other tags to give more precise and useful data. All the best François
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
