On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 05:01:17PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > I can give you a case that is more complicated. The University of > > Edinburgh. As well as a main> campus, and a subsidiary mini-campus, it > > has individual buildings scattered all around the city.> It could be mapped > > as a multipolygon but it would be a lot of work. Imagine using a > > multipolygon> natural=wood to handle many individual, widely-spaced trees > > by poking lots ofi rregular, large holes> in it where trees aren't. > > See > https://www.ed.ac.uk/maps/maps <https://www.ed.ac.uk/maps/maps>> > > And note that what you get there is the first of five tabs> covering > > different agglomerations of buildings. > > > > I think the only feasible way of handling this would be a site relation. > > Maybe you can think of a better> way of handling it. > > > > > Why selecting buildings and tagging them to site relation is easier than > selecting building and adding them to a multipolygon realation?
looks like abuse of multipolygon relation to me. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
