Am 28.09.2018 um 18:07 schrieb Bryan Housel: >> I actually mentioned the issue in Milano. >> >> Essentially `traffic_sign`, `traffic_sign:forward` and >> `traffic_sign:backward` need to be treated as "object" tags as things >> are now. >> > Let’s just do `traffic_sign=*` and consider the others an unfortunate > mistake that can go away. There are a total of 37'000 forward / backward variants that would have to be migrated to traffic_sign + a suitable sub tag, not an awful lot in the grand scheme of things, but needs to be done.
> > >> See pages 29 and 30 >> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1LVmZIaEvd1K7mYVqDLnrhC5-jHLHy0lQ >> >> And I should note that iD has "plot" as such a key which is equally >> mysterious, but I couldn't quite convince myself to include in the list. >> > Not sure.. I just checked and iD don’t have `plot=*` as a key value, > so maybe there’s an error in whatever process you used to gather the > data.. Sorry, just confusion on my hand: I was actually referring to allotments=plot with allotments as the "top-level" key (the plot bit is what I remembered, but it is still a one off top-level key). Simon > > The “toplevel” key values in iD are really just the names of all the > folders here: > https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/tree/master/data/presets/presets > > Thanks, Bryan > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
