Section_name, is there not something like this in the whitewater tagging scheme? Yep: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:whitewater:section_name&action=edit&redlink=1
And yes, this tagging scheme extend to brown/blue/green river sections. Yves Le 27 septembre 2018 16:14:47 GMT+02:00, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > >sent from a phone > >> On 27. Sep 2018, at 15:57, Dave Swarthout <daveswarth...@gmail.com> >wrote: >> >> This bend may or may not lend its name to a locality but it is >primarily a feature of the river, not the name of a settled place. > > >locality is explicitly for toponyms that don’t refer to settlements or >their parts. I agree that a node is not nice, because we might want to >tag sections of a river that are quite long, and a node doesn’t express >this. > >Another idea would be to use additionally a subtag on the part, e.g. >section_name=* > >Cheers, >Martin >_______________________________________________ >Tagging mailing list >Tagging@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
