Not all of them have no windows.
I'd tag it as what it is, building=telephone_exchange. That would be
suitable with or without windows.
I have added a section on them to
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:WikiProject_Telecoms#Telephone_Exchange
You can attempt to contact the original mapper .. they may well point to
the OSM wiki telecoms page, that looks to be the source of it.
On 16/09/18 18:48, Anton Klim wrote:
Hi,
The telecom tagging scheme (on wiki) definitely had a tag for
telephone exchanges.
For a building without windows, I’d suggest building=service
16 сент. 2018 г., в 8:48, José G Moya Y. <josem...@gmail.com
<mailto:josem...@gmail.com>> написал(а):
Hi!
Path 374362033 ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374362033 ) is a
building with no windows in Calle del Fúcar, 28014 Madrid that
contains a phone exchange (originally it was a gigantic relay system
for the phones of the area, now probably replaced with smaller
computers and microcontrollers).
It is tagged as "building=central office", a non-standard tag.
I wonder if tagging it as "building=industrial" would be better,
despite of the whole neigbourhood being officially classified as
"tertiary use" (non-industrial).
Or maybe "building=yes" would be just enough. Path 28996211 (
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28996211 ) is a similar phone
exchange building, near Delicias, Madrid, enough old to be announced
as "phone booths that way" on the street. It is tagged as "building=yes".
Do you think I should change the tag on 374362033?
Yours,
José Moya
Madrid
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
