To me, waterway=* should only get values to map linear water courses for the routable hydrographic network. Newer tagging with natural=water sounds ok, except for artificial water features. I'm not so keen of natural=water over a man made irrigation canal, unless there is no artificial water, even in artificial man made structures
All the best François Le jeu. 6 sept. 2018 à 15:53, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > sent from a phone > > > On 6. Sep 2018, at 15:37, Tom Pfeifer <t.pfei...@computer.org> wrote: > > > > well it is certainly the _older_ scheme than natural=water + > water=river, insofar the statement is not wrong. The wiki page for > 'riverbank' says, it "remains in widespread use and is still preferred by > some mappers." I.e. 279K vs. 19K for water=river. > > > +1 > according to tag history the older scheme grows at least at the same speed > as the newer alternative. > > > Cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
