How many routes are ciclopedonale in Italy? I have seen one in 8 days of cycling though Northern Italia, and it was a way or connection rather than a marked/named route.
Mvg Peter Elderson > Op 2 sep. 2018 om 16:13 heeft Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven: > > My reaction was to how I read your message, it seemed like you would create 2 > route_master relations and use those as members in a route relation. > > For foot and bicycle relations it is possible to use sub relations for parts > in common between multiple routes, or if one route is designated separately > but is part of a 'superroute', but if I understood correctly for that case > both would be route relations. > > That's not what this case is about is about though. > > If the renderers and routers can cope with it, simply use a semicolon between > the tags, in case the members are exactly the same. If not, ask them to > update their software logic. In that case one route relation for multiple > 'modes of transport' suffices and we can keep things simple. > > Polyglot > > > > Op zo 2 sep. 2018 om 15:05 schreef Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com>: >> On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> In public transport: >> >> Walking and cycling routes are not public transport. Nevertheless >> (according to the wiki) route masters can be used >> with them. >> >>> 1 (one) route_master relation for the line >>> >>> 1 or more (typically 2) route relations for the variations in itinerary. >> >> I don't understand what point you're trying to make. Or how those sentences >> contradict the idea of using a route >> master to cope with the variations of walking and cycling. Unconventional, >> yes, but you're the person who invented >> the reverse role for routes, so you don't let conventions bind you. If the >> walking and cycling route weren't exactly >> identical (as is often the case) but largely corresponded, would a route >> master be appropriate then? If not, why >> not? It's a route from A to B with variants. >> >> It was just a thought, anyway. As I said, I didn't think through all the >> ramifications. But nothing you've said so far >> convinces me the idea is wrong. >> >> -- >> Paul >> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
