There are routes out there that can be used by bicycle and on foot. Up tp now I have classified them as one or the or the other, tagging according to the prevalent use. This is unsatisfactory and, strictly speaking, not corresponding to the principle of on-the-ground-truth.
I would like to distinguish between - routes that are exclusively hiking (containing ways that are off-limits for bicycles) - routes that are exclusively for cycling (containing ways that are not suitable for pedestrians) - routes that are intended for double use The formally correct solution is "route=hiking;bicycle", and network=lwn;lcn ecc but this tagging is discouraged [1] and is flagged as error by JOSM, and I suspect that it also not supported by data users, as it is not documented anywhere. In my part of the world (Northern Italy) we have plenty of mixed-use routes, which is in most cases already reflected in their name " percorso ciclo-pedonale ". I suppose that this has been discussed in the past, and apologize if I did not find (or forgot) where. [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
