Then you're just splitting class and race hairs. On Fri, Aug 17, 2018, 11:20 seirra <gene...@sarifria.x10.bz> wrote:
> there can be notable areas though, outside of what may usually be expected > > On 08/17/18 16:03, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018, 16:35 seirra <gene...@sarifria.x10.bz> wrote: > >> hmmm i do see the point there about racial/class bias... i was thinking >> more about areas that were known crime spots/had associated illegal >> activities people may want to avoid(to the point there are regular police >> patrols at night)? also places where getting a phone out could lead to it >> being stolen? i've heard that can be an issue in some areas. just wasn't >> sure if any of those scenarios really deserved tagging because i didn't >> really feel there was a bias there? either way just wanted to check (sorry >> if this shows up as a double post, i saw there was a reply to mailing list >> option i should be using, i get the impression the first time didn't send) >> > > At that point, you're just avoiding cities in general, as crime rates tend > to increase proportionally to population density. > >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing > listTagging@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
