On 18/07/18 16:27, Andrew Davidson wrote:
On 18/07/18 13:02, Warin wrote:
Voting stopped due to removal of section.
That was my bad. I'd been confused when I found three voting sections
on the page. From your email I had been expecting to vote twice, but
when I found three sections and noticed that you had only voted twice
I had assumed that the third vote was a cut-and-paste error.
I apologise, I should have read the third section much, much more
closely before deleting.
I should have made it clear.
Having said that the third vote is a little redundant. The second vote
is "Optional voting on a default of intermittent=yes for the key
ephemeral" and the third vote is "Optional voting on requesting
mappers to add intermittent=yes to the key ephemeral". The only
internally logical votes are yes for two and no for three (or
vice-versa). If you vote yes/yes then you are saying the default for
intermittent is yes but you still have to add it. If you vote no/no
then you are saying the default value for intermittent is no but you
don't have to add it for ephemeral=*.
The last 2 votes are meant to be yes for one only, as I said .. I
should have made that clear.
There is no compulsion to vote for the last 2, it is just 2 different
ways of doing the same thing.
So voting yes for one of the two will do the job.
I'll try a table and see how that looks .. the options side by side
might be a visual hint.
---------------------------------
It will give me a chance to respond to some of the votes already cast ..
which I'll take the full opportunity to do so :)
So in a way it is a good thing.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
