I was going to suggest the same as Eric. Best to use the ISO codes for the languages (though I think maybe the three-letter codes are better) and to use language as the prefix.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 4:30 PM, <e...@eric-poehlsen.de> wrote: > Hi, > > > > language information could be an interesting tag for tourist places, > schools, etc. > > > > but I think that this method is not the best one. > > > > I’d expect something like: > language=eo > > > > Or with multiple languages > > language=en;de;fr;es;eo > > > > language:signs=en;de;fr > > language:spoken=de;en > > language:menu=cn;en > > > > Eric > > > > *Von:* Michał Brzozowski <www.ha...@gmail.com> > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2018 12:22 > *An:* Tag discussion, strategy and related tools < > tagging@openstreetmap.org> > *Betreff:* [Tagging] esperanto=yes > > > > Hi, > > > > Today user przem started to add esperanto=yes to two kinds of objects > > - streets named after Zamenhof (creator of it) > > - schools which presumably use or teach it > > > > For the first case it would be correct to tag > name:etymology:wikidata=Q11758 > > > > But how about the second case? > > esperanto=yes seems too vague to be useful, and is a precedent (I didn't > see english=yes etc. being used). It seems to be a catch-all for everything > related to esperanto, not unlike your typical hashtags in social media. > > > > Michał > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
