sent from a phone
> On 23. Jun 2018, at 18:39, Bryan Housel <bhou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "Consensus on list is that covered=booth offers no additional information > over booth=* and conflicts with existing semantics for covered=yes/no. We'll > replace all instances of covered=booth with covered=yes and add a booth=yes > to any features that don't already have a booth tag.” covered has been defined as yes/no/covered by what since 2013, there is no conflict at all. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:covered&oldid=918451 There are 4300 booth=* but there are 20% more covered=booth The booth key has no wiki definition, so it remains completely obscure what it is intended to mean. I do not see a basis for modifying the wiki in the suggested way, even less for an automated edit in favor of the less used, undocumented tagging style. Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
