On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Andy Townsend <ajt1...@gmail.com> wrote:
If you can find out who mapped them then you can at least ask why they > tagged them like that. What information do they think would be lost if > that tag was removed? > I can tell you why I used covered=booth. Because, at the time I mapped those public telephones the wiki said that if they were in a booth to use covered=booth. It also said that if I knew the booth type (I'm not a booth spotter, so I don't) I could additionally use booth=*. If covered=booth were removed we'd lose the information that the phone was in a booth unless booth=* had also been specified. If it were replaced with booth=yes (where no booth=* is already present) I'd be a happy bunny. I'd still like to see a proposal for how to deal with phones that have an acoustic hood (which provides partial cover) as opposed to phones with no cover at all (see picture of Deutsche Telecom phone posted elsewhere in the thread). -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
