> On Jun 19, 2018, at 7:41 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > 2018-06-19 11:17 GMT+02:00 Andrew Harvey <andrew.harv...@gmail.com > <mailto:andrew.harv...@gmail.com>>: > Martin, which part? The whole reason this discussion started is because Bryan > wants to offer a way to tag a lifeguard facility iD without forcing users to > choose the exact kind of lifeguard facility. At the moment with the current > documentation on the wiki you need to choose what type, and can't say it's a > generic. > > My suggestion for this case is to add lifeguard/s=yes as property to the > guarded object or part of the object that is guarded / supervised, or maybe > supervised:lifeguard=yes ?
You can do this too, I won’t complain. > If Bryan wants to propose a new "neutral" lifeguard facility which does not > bear any information in the first level about the kind of feature on the > ground (in contrast to the system that has evolved through the comunity > process), I suggest he sets up a proposal. There are currently only 6 uses of > emergency=lifeguard The lifeguard tags that have "evolved through the community process" are flawed and not really used much, so we’re changing them. (I will not be doing a proposal, but posting to tagging mailing list seems nicer than just changing things) going forward: `emergency=lifeguard` `lifeguard=*` (tbh I dont care what values go here, base, place, space, whatever) > water_rescue_station vs. lifeguard_base > > there are 216 emergency=water_rescue_station which to me seems a pretty self > explanatory tag to indicate a somehow permanent presence of lifeguards with > some infrastructure. The wiki says it is in proximity to the water surface it > is guarding. The other tag is emergency=lifeguard_base with 240 uses and > defined as the "main building" where the administrative work gets done and > equipment and vehicles are "stored". It’s fine for people to keep tagging these but I probably wouldn't add a preset for this in iD. > as the lifeguard base is defined for storage and administration, it doesn't > seem to fit with the expectations one would have from a potential new > emergency=lifeguard. It could be `office=lifeguard` then. Let’s get rid of them. Thanks, Bryan
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
