Name should indeed be changed, but I'd go for lanes:transition...., so it groups with the other lanes related tags. Not sure if that is a good type for the relation though.
There is no need to bother the user, in case there is an adjacent way with this tag. Then it's obvious which part of the split off way should either remain in the relation or keep the tag. In case there is no adjacent way with that tag, or the relation contains 2 ways which don't connect, a validation error should be shown. Polyglot Op ma 11 jun. 2018 om 08:07 schreef Mateusz Konieczny < matkoni...@tutanota.com>: > For JOSM see https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/11054 > > 11. Jun 2018 06:42 by bhou...@gmail.com: > > I’m not going to add a special rule in iD to warn people if they are > splitting a way with a lane transition tag. I don’t want to speak for the > JOSM devs, but I doubt they would implement something like this either. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
