You might (or might not) want to reconcile this with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpublic_bath
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Jyri-Petteri Paloposki < jyri-petteri.palopo...@iki.fi> wrote: > On 10.06.2018 16:14, osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au wrote: > > If you are tagging one individual leisure=sauna, it makes sense that the > sauna key has only one value. > > > > But if you are tagging sauna=* on a hotel or other larger object that > contains a sauna, there might be different ones available. > > > > In that case, there should be some defined way to allow multiple values, > probably either: > > > > sauna=hot;steam;dry > > > > or > > > > sauna:hot=yes > > sauna:steam=yes > > sauna:dry=yes > > > > The 2nd variant has the advantage that it invites easy extensions like: > > > > sauna:hot:count=3 > > sauna:steam:opening_hours=16:00:22:00 > > The proposal has already been updated to allow multiple values with a > semicolon. It is true that the subkey solution would be more extendable, > should the proposal be changed to use that? > > Best regards, > -- > Jyri-Petteri Paloposki > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
