On 08/06/18 18:25, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
8. Jun 2018 00:48 by kevin.b.kenny+...@gmail.com
<mailto:kevin.b.kenny+...@gmail.com>:
In the meantime, there is no supported tagging to show 'forestry'
as a land use rather than asserting 'every square metre of this
polygon is covered with trees.'
I see no reason whatsoever to render this kind of landuse on general
purpose map.
Also, anyway there is nobody interested in tagging this information,
time wasted on this discussion
would allow to increase how many landuse=forestry hundredfold.
Seriously, so much time wasted on discussing landuse=forestry and it
has 9[sic!] uses.
I'd quite happily change all 'my' local landuse=forest to
landuse=forestry ... there would then be a lot more than 9.
Some 68 with recreational facilities and about 540 more with no
facilities. More in other places. And these truly are used for
production, not just the presence of trees.
But the present renders and mappers would not like it.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
