I've always been editing using JOSM and using the "lane and road attributes" mapstyle for visualization (which is pretty much the only editor/map style I'm aware of that has support for the large majority of lane related tags, making it pretty much the defacto standard implementation given the the majority of the relevant proposals never went to voting).
I've never gotten any validation errors when correctly tagging a road with cycle lanes (that is, e.g. for a "normal" 2-way road: lanes=2, cycleway=lane, and :lanes:forward and :lanes:backward tags with 2 values each). If there are any validation tools that would complain about this situation, then they are broken and the bug needs to be reported. > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> > Sent: Friday, 11 May 2018 18:26 > To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools > <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] tagging of one-way cycle lanes > > > The definitions of what a lane is for these two tags are > different. That's fine. They don't have to be the same. > > it would help though that validators and QA tools would not really > warn about the difference. Now people might start wondering whose > right. > > m. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
