What I have for now :
Disabled Parking - Way: 587061339
Tags:
"access"="disabled"
"surface"="paved"
"amenity"="parking"
"capacity:disabled"="3"
"description"="Disabled Parking"
"source"="survey"
"capacity"="3"
Ambulance Parking - Way: 584778386
Tags:
"access"="emergency"
"capacity:emergency"="3"
"surface"="paved"
"amenity"="parking"
"description"="Ambulance Only"
"source"="LPI Imagery + knowledge"
"capacity"="3"
15 min parking Way: 584778387
Tags:
"maxstay"=".25"
"source"="LPI Imagery + knowledge"
"surface"="paved"
"amenity"="parking"
Not certain of the 15 minute parking capacity .. would need to look ..
too much of a hurry when I have been there to note the capacity. Left by
a different way.
On 10/05/18 13:04, Johnparis wrote:
If it's exclusive the normal tagging would be:
access=no
disabled=yes
...to be consistent with other such, like
access=no
bus=yes
Though I would argue that they all should use the access: prefix in
this case
access=no
access:disabled=yes
On Thu, May 10, 2018, 02:51 Andrew Davidson <thesw...@gmail.com
<mailto:thesw...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 10/5/18 10:34, Warin wrote:
>
> and then the consumer would need to test it for exclusivity.
>
That does appear to be the logic applied.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
