2018-04-11 11:30 GMT+02:00 John Willis <jo...@mac.com>: > Actual flower Farms are landuse=farmland crop=flowers. Yea, they may have > a viewpoint and a gift shop. But those large commercial farms are not what > I'm talking about. > > These are about tagging the actual beds of decorative flowers with > landuse=flowerbed (which I think is totally a landuse - it is land > dedicated to flowers for display or decoration)
I understand the land is dedicated to displaying flowers, but landuses are usually broader categories. And I wouldn't look at these in a feature agnostic way. An area with decorative flowers organized and presented in flowerbeds, with visitors and maybe a fee, will be something, like a flower show, with a name, maybe a website etc. that distinguishes them from the private flowerbeds in a residential area. IMHO you should aim at representing this feature. It doesn't mean you can't map the single flowerbed inside, but first I'd look for a way to represent the whole thing. > , and tagging gardens that are "flower spectacles" - places that grow > flowers primarily as a spectacle (and often charge admission) using a > garden:type=foobar is the two tags I am asking for feedback on. > Landuse=grass is crappy - is it for sports? picnicing? Roadside shoulder? > Landscaping? > leisure=garden with subtags if you like Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
