But we're not talking about either farmland or a crop in this case. The flowers (or flowerbed, if you prefer) I'm talking about is actually a tourist attraction and is maintained for that purpose.
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 6:38 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2018-04-09 13:08 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@gmail.com>: > >> On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 01:50:50 +0000 >> Dave Swarthout <daveswarth...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > How about >> > tourism=attraction >> > attraction=flowers >> >> I think that man_made=flowerbed + tourism=attraction would be >> preferable, it would allow tagging also flower fields that are not a >> tourism attraction at all. >> >> > > +1, I would also prefer not creating a category for attractions which > would then be defined as what they are by subtags, because everything can > happen to be an attraction and it would ultimately lead to double tagging > everything, an attraction version and not. > > For the flower field, maybe landuse=farmland with crop=* could also be an > option? > > > Cheers, > Martin > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging