I've tried to accomplish that many years ago already, it failed. The people at the helm of the rendering stack consider the 'old' tags good enough and the new scheme somehow not explicit enough, hence the double tagging.
Dropping the tags you call obsolete from the data, is not an option as far as I'm concerned. Part of the reason for mapping bus stops, is to get them rendered on the map. That's not tagging for the renderer, that's merely being practical and adapting to the situation at hand. Adding public_transport=platform/stop_position is also being practical, as they are treated in certain ways by JOSM, with regard to assignment of roles. I stopped worrying about the wasted disk space or processing power several years ago. Polyglot 2018-03-28 17:48 GMT+02:00 Marián Kyral <mky...@email.cz>: > > ---------- Původní e-mail ---------- > Od: "Christian Müller" <cmu...@gmx.de> > Komu: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Datum: 28. 3. 2018 16:22:41 > Předmět: Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms > > > Sent: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:53:28 +0300 > > From: "Ilya Zverev" <i...@zverev.info> > > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > > Subject: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms > > > > Hi folks, > > > > A while ago I've made a proposal to deprecate some public_transport=* > tags: > > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ > Drop_stop_positions_and_platforms > > > > In your proposal you complain about subjectively felt things like "history > won't go away", but at the same time you are trying to revert a part of > history itself - "the public_transport tags are seven years old now". Many > people were involved creating those tags, they are well understood and > discriminate the features they describe in a thoroughly documented and > plausible way. > > Just because a lot of deprecated tags have not vanished in favor of the > new ones yet does not mean there is a preference on the deprecated tags. A > lot of users and apps have adopted the new public_transport tags. It simply > does not make any sense to do a rollback on these for the observation of a > sluggish adoption/transition rate. > > > I fully agree with this. > > > I'm still waiting for full support of new public_transport schema on maps > (especially on the "transport" layer on osm.org) and decommission of the > old schema. Still no progress on it.. Instead, we still have to use > obsolete tags like highway=bus_stop to see stops on the map. It is mapping > for render I think and we should stop doing it, convert old schema objects > to new schema (a MapRoulette task?) and use only new schema. > > > I think the new schema is really good and should be fully implemented. It > means have support in editors and renderers. > > > Marián > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
