2018-02-14 1:03 GMT+01:00 François Lacombe <fl.infosrese...@gmail.com>:
> I don't get the point about waterway=pressurised. > Is this that bad, or you just don't want ot use it? > 2018-02-14 12:06 GMT+01:00 François Lacombe <fl.infosrese...@gmail.com>: > 2018-02-14 11:30 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > >I think it should be a property like pressurised=yes/no > > Given problem isn't regarding pressurised in particular but to add > meaningful waterway values on every feature carrying large amount of water. > IMHO you'll have to look at these one by one. "waterway=pressurised" is still in your proposal, so I think we are talking also about this. not sure if waterway=pipe makes sense? From what I read, "culvert" is describing that a waterway is flowing under something else, so it is not generally applicable for waterways in tubes. Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
