Hi all, did I miss the "consensus with the community, after long and detailed discussions" here ? https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-October/033760.html
There are two guys which appear to me like religios bigot on an Inquisition, but maybe the definitions in the wiki are just unclear / too interpretable : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rtfm Please let me know what you think of this definition https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like#When_to_create_a_proposal and whether it applies to the "motorcycle_friendly" tag. Cheers, Thilo Am 05.10.2017 um 23:19 schrieb Warin: > On 05-Oct-17 10:41 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote: >> >> >> In my understanding, we would not map the personal preferences and >> hobbies of individuals. > > ? We all map our personal preference and hobbies! > Walkers map public rights of way and bicycle riders map bicycle paths, > bicycle parking, bicycle repair stands, drinking water sources and so on. > > Why should motorcycle riders not do the same? > Or pet owners? > > The motivation of a business owner to provide specific services is for > profit, if they have specific knowledge of a particular market, such > as motorcycling, then they may use it to advantage. > I don't see any harm in that - after all OSM is mapping crafts and > shops where the people concerned have skills in those areas. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
