Undone. But we need to talk about how messy the scheme is becoming by mapping cycleways and sidewalks differently when separate from the main way.
We have sidewalk=separate [1] on the main way to express that a sidewalk was mapped separately. We have footway=sidewalk [2] on the separate way to express that it is a sidewalk and not some other kind of footway. On cycleways, we don't suggest using any tag (we only advise against double representation) [3], even though cycleway=sidepath has been used for both purposes [4]. It would be sensible to use the same terminology to express the same concept, while adoption is still low. [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sidewalk%3Dseparate [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk [3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Cycle_tracks [4] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dsidepath On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Andy Townsend <ajt1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 15/01/2018 14:47, Fernando Trebien wrote: >> >> When mapping sidewalks and cycleways, it is possible to do so as tags >> on the line of the motorised way [1][2] or as standalone lines >> parallel to it [1][3]. > > > You've recently changed the wiki to suggest that sidewalk=sidepath is valid: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:sidewalk&diff=next&oldid=1523440 > > taginfo suggests that almost no-one uses it, so I don't think that this is a > sensible wiki change: > > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/sidewalk=sidepath > > The wiki is at its best when it describes how people map, not when people > who have not mapped a thing tell other people how to map things. > > Best Regards, > Andy > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging -- Fernando Trebien +55 (51) 9962-5409 "Nullius in verba." _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging