2017-11-09 21:12 GMT+01:00 Michal Fabík <michal.fa...@gmail.com>: > On 1.11.2017 11:50, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > Hi, sorry for the long pause. > Ok, following Warin's suggestion: > > > https://www.sicurauto.it/upload/news_/8684/img/2038-cartelli > sperimentali-pneumatici-invernali.png > motor_vehicle:conditional=winter_equipment @ (Nov 15-Apr 15) > > > http://www.rmastri.it/plugins/image_gallery/images/gallery/8 > 7777194ca9513d72ed09adb11f0f3af.jpg > motor_vehicle:conditional=yes @ winter_equipment > > or > > motor_vehicle:conditional=winter_equipment @ winter > > (Not sure if the sign implies all the time or within a time span defined > by law.) > > > https://www.avd.de/fileadmin/content/Bilder/Unterseiten/Rech > t/Content/Verkehrszeichen-268.png > > motor_vehicle:conditional=yes @ snow_chains > motor_vehicle:conditional=snow_chains @ winter
I believe the question remains whether "winter_equipment" is sufficient or if we want to distinguish. e.g. between winter tyres and snow chains or spikes. There might also be different regulations for different kind of vehicle, e.g. hgv, motorbikes, ... (E.g. in Germany, you will generally have to use winter tyres (at the moment still also M+S, but AFAIK they are currently changing this) in the winter, but there are signs that make snow chains obligatory for the road.). Wikipedia has a summary page in German about the situation in different countries: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winterausr%C3%BCstung_(Stra%C3%9Fenverkehr) Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
